We need your consent to use the individual data so that you can see information about your interests, among other things. Click "OK" to give your consent.
Standard Practice for Reporting Uniaxial Strength Data and Estimating Weibull Distribution Parameters for Advanced Ceramics
STANDARD published on 1.1.2006
Designation standards: ASTM C1239-06
Note: WITHDRAWN
Publication date standards: 1.1.2006
SKU: NS-10192
The number of pages: 19
Approximate weight : 57 g (0.13 lbs)
Country: American technical standard
Category: Technical standards ASTM
Keywords:
advanced ceramics, censored data, confidence bounds, fractography, fracture origin, maximum likelihood, strength, unbiasing factors, Weibull characteristic strength, Weibull modulus, Weibull scale parameter, Weibull statistics, ICS Number Code 81.060.99 (Other standards related to ceramics)
| 1. Scope | ||||||||||||
|
1.1 This practice covers the evaluation and subsequent reporting of uniaxial strength data and the estimation of probability distribution parameters for advanced ceramics that fail in a brittle fashion. The failure strength of advanced ceramics is treated as a continuous random variable. Typically, a number of test specimens with well-defined geometry are failed under well-defined isothermal forcing conditions. The force at which each test specimen fails is recorded. The resulting failure stresses are used to obtain parameter estimates associated with the underlying population distribution. This practice is restricted to the assumption that the distribution underlying the failure strengths is the two-parameter Weibull distribution with size scaling. Furthermore, this practice is restricted to test specimens (tensile, flexural, pressurized ring, etc.) that are primarily subjected to uniaxial stress states. Section 8 outlines methods to correct for bias errors in the estimated Weibull parameters and to calculate confidence bounds on those estimates from data sets where all failures originate from a single flaw population (that is, a single failure mode). In samples where failures originate from multiple independent flaw populations (for example, competing failure modes), the methods outlined in Section 8 for bias correction and confidence bounds are not applicable. 1.2 Measurements of the strength at failure are taken for one of two reasons: either for a comparison of the relative quality of two materials, or the prediction of the probability of failure (or, alternatively, the fracture strength) for a structure of interest. This practice will permit estimates of the distribution parameters that are needed for either. In addition, this practice encourages the integration of mechanical property data and fractographic analysis. 1.3 This practice includes the following: 1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard per IEEE/ASTM SI 10. |
||||||||||||
| 2. Referenced Documents | ||||||||||||
|
Do you want to make sure you use only the valid technical standards?
We can offer you a solution which will provide you a monthly overview concerning the updating of standards which you use.
Would you like to know more? Look at this page.
Latest update: 2026-05-17 (Number of items: 2 278 942)
© Copyright 2026 NORMSERVIS s.r.o.