We need your consent to use the individual data so that you can see information about your interests, among other things. Click "OK" to give your consent.
Standard Guide for Stakeholder Engagement on Environmental Risk Management and Climate
Translate name
STANDARD published on 1.10.2022
Designation standards: ASTM E3356-22
Publication date standards: 1.10.2022
SKU: NS-1089390
The number of pages: 14
Approximate weight : 42 g (0.09 lbs)
Country: American technical standard
Category: Technical standards ASTM
Keywords:
affected parties, alternative dispute resolution, climate vulnerability, meaningful involvement, stakeholder engagement, vulnerable communities,
| Significance and Use |
|
5.1?Stakeholder engagement, in the 5.2?It is important that stakeholders understand the role they are invited to play in a public engagement program. This will help provide clarity to the process and help avoid misunderstandings. 5.3?EPAs FIG. 2?EPA Public Involvement Spectrum. |
| 1. Scope |
|
1.1?This guide provides a series of steps to develop and execute an effective stakeholder engagement process for a broad spectrum of environmental projects including, but not limited to, site remediation and brownfields development, as well as local and regional climate resiliency and climate vulnerability initiatives. This guide does not apply to broad programmatic initiatives. 1.2?Effective stakeholder engagement in site remediation, brownfields redevelopment, habitat restoration, climate resiliency, climate vulnerability, and flood prevention and control projects requires a process that is based on mutual education, effective communication about the project and its impacts, identification of the interests that will be affected, and open discussion about how to address those interests to the extent that is possible. The General Accountability Office suggests that core principles and strategic approaches enhance stakeholder participation (GAO 2006)1.3?An effective FIG. 1 Stakeholder Engagement Process 1.3.1?Improved, sustainable outcomes, because the final project plan builds on local capacity and knowledge and considers local and regional issues that may require resolution in order to move forward. 1.3.2?Shared understanding of perspectives, issues, challenges, alternatives, and how these influence the desired or necessary outcomes 1.3.3?Credibility of and predictability for the project plan that comes from transparency 1.3.4?Stakeholder support for the planning process through shared data, ideas, funding, and political support 1.3.5?Strengthened relationships among 1.3.6 Satisfying any legally-required public notice and participation requirements. 1.3.6.1?Stakeholder engagement should not be confused with the public participation requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act codified in 40 CFR ?6.203. because NEPA potentially does not involve stakeholders until later in the project development process. In addition, NEPA's public participation process is not as flexible as that described in this guide. 1.3.7?Welp and Stoll-Kleeman (2006)1.3.7.1?Enhanced understanding, 1.3.7.2?Developing new options, 1.3.7.3?Decreasing hostility among participants through improved dialog and discussion, 1.3.7.4?Enlightening legal policy makers, 1.3.7.5?Producing competent, fair, and optimized solutions, 1.3.7.6?Accelerating the decision-making process. 1.4?In order to identify prospective stakeholders, ISO 26000 clause 5.3.2 suggests that an organization should ask the following questions: 1.4.1?To whom does the organization have legal obligations? 1.4.2?Who might be positively or negatively affected by the organizations decisions, activities, or anticipated outcomes? 1.4.2.1?Mediators and facilitators are expected to be neutral parties. 1.4.3?Who is likely to express opinions and concerns about the decisions and activities of the organization? 1.4.4?Who has been involved in the past when similar concerns needed to be addressed? 1.4.5?Who can help the organization address specific impacts? 1.4.6?Who can affect the organizations ability to meet its responsibilities? 1.4.7?Who are the affected parties that would be disadvantaged if excluded from the engagement? 1.5?Stakeholder prioritization criteria 1.5.1?Identification of criteria to prioritize 1.5.1.1?Level of interest, 1.5.1.2?Proximity, including nearby property owners,, 1.5.1.3?Fairness, 1.5.1.4?Magnitude of impact, 1.5.1.5?Underrepresented and underserved populations, 1.5.1.6?Probability of impact, 1.5.1.7?Level of community influence, 1.5.1.8? Cost, and 1.5.1.9?Time to implement a proposed project plan. 1.6?This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. |
Do you want to make sure you use only the valid technical standards?
We can offer you a solution which will provide you a monthly overview concerning the updating of standards which you use.
Would you like to know more? Look at this page.
Latest update: 2026-07-13 (Number of items: 2 286 490)
© Copyright 2026 NORMSERVIS s.r.o.