Cookies
We need your consent to use the individual data so that you can see information about your interests, among other things. Click "OK" to give your consent.
IEC 61788-4-ed.5.0-RLV
Superconductivity - Part 4: Residual resistance ratio measurement - Residual resistance ratio of Nb-Ti and Nb3Sn composite superconductors
Translate name
STANDARD published on 20.3.2020
The information about the standard:
Designation standards: IEC 61788-4-ed.5.0-RLV
Publication date standards: 20.3.2020
SKU: NS-1095756
The number of pages: 103
Approximate weight : 340 g (0.75 lbs)
Country: International technical standard
Category: Technical standards IEC
The category - similar standards:
Measurement of electrical and magnetic quantitiesConducting materials
Annotation of standard text IEC 61788-4-ed.5.0-RLV :
IEC 61788-4:2020 RLV contains both the official IEC International Standard and its Redline version. The Redline version is available in English only and provides you with a quick and easy way to compare all the changes between the official IEC Standard and its previous edition. IEC 61788-4:2020 specifies a test method for the determination of the residual resistance ratio (RRR) of Nb-Ti and Nb3Sn composite superconductors with Cu, Cu-Ni, Cu/Cu-Ni and Al matrix in a strain-free condition and zero external magnetic field. This method is intended for use with superconductor specimens that have a monolithic structure with rectangular or round cross-section, RRR value less than 350, and cross-sectional area less than 3 mm2. In the case of Nb3Sn, the specimens have received a reaction heat-treatment. This fifth edition cancels and replaces the fourth edition published in 2016. This edition constitutes a technical revision. This edition includes the following significant technical changes with respect to the previous edition: a) change in the suitable distance of voltage taps on the specimen for reliable measurement, b) new report on the result of the round robin test of the residual resistance ratio of Nb3Sn superconductors that proves the validity of the measurement method in this standard, c) revision of the confusing definitions of the copper ratio and copper fraction.
We recommend:
Technical standards updating
Do you want to make sure you use only the valid technical standards?
We can offer you a solution which will provide you a monthly overview concerning the updating of standards which you use.
Would you like to know more? Look at this page.
