We need your consent to use the individual data so that you can see information about your interests, among other things. Click "OK" to give your consent.
Standard Test Method (Analytical Procedure) for Determining the Efficiency of a Production Well in a Confined Aquifer from a Constant Rate Pumping Test (Includes all amendments And changes 1/31/2017).
Automatically translated name:
Standard Test Method (Analytical Procedure) for Determining the Efficiency of a Production Well in a Confined Aquifer from a Constant Rate Pumping Test
STANDARD published on 1.8.2010
Designation standards: ASTM D6034-96(2010)e1
Note: WITHDRAWN
Publication date standards: 1.8.2010
SKU: NS-33501
The number of pages: 8
Approximate weight : 24 g (0.05 lbs)
Country: American technical standard
Category: Technical standards ASTM
Keywords:
anisotropy, aquifers, aquifer tests, control wells, groundwater, hydraulic conductivity, observation wells, storage coefficient, transmissivity, well efficiency: Anisotropy, Aquifers, Control wells, Ground water, Hydraulic conductivity/transmissivity, Observation wells, Storage--aquifers, Transmissivity, Well efficiency, ICS Number Code 93.160 (Hydraulic construction)
| Significance and Use | ||||||
|
This test method allows the user to compute the true hydraulic efficiency of a pumped well in a confined aquifer from a constant rate pumping test. The procedures described constitute the only valid method of determining well efficiency. Some practitioners have confused well efficiency with percentage of head loss associated with laminar flow, a parameter commonly determined from a step-drawdown test. Well efficiency, however, cannot be determined from a step-drawdown test but only can be determined from a constant rate test. Assumptions: Control well discharges at a constant rate, Q. Control well is of infinitesimal diameter. Data are obtained from the control well and, if available, a number of observation wells. The aquifer is confined, homogeneous, and areally extensive. The aquifer may be anisotropic, and if so, the directions of maximum and minimum hydraulic conductivity are horizontal and vertical, respectively. Discharge from the well is derived exclusively from storage in the aquifer. Calculation Requirements—For the special case of partially penetrating wells, application of this test method may be computationally intensive. The function fs shown in Eq 6 must be evaluated using arbitrary input parameters. It is not practical to use existing, somewhat limited, tables of values for fs and, because this equation is rather formidable, it is not readily tractable by hand. Because of this, it is assumed the practitioner using this test method will have available a computerized procedure for evaluating the function fs. This can be accomplished using commercially available mathematical software including some spreadsheet applications or by writing programs in languages, such as Fortran or C. If calculating fs is not practical, it is possible to substitute the Kozeny equation for the Hantush equation as previously described. |
||||||
| 1. Scope | ||||||
|
1.1 This test method describes an analytical procedure for determining the hydraulic efficiency of a production well in a confined aquifer. It involves comparing the actual drawdown in the well to the theoretical minimum drawdown achievable and is based upon data and aquifer coefficients obtained from a constant rate pumping test. 1.2 This analytical procedure is used in conjunction with the field procedure, Test Method D4050. 1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard, except as noted below. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units, which are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.3.1 The gravitational system of inch-pound units is used when dealing with inch-pound units. In this system, the pound (lbf) represents a unit of force (weight), while the unit for mass is slugs. 1.4 Limitations—The limitations of the technique for determination of well efficiency are related primarily to the correspondence between the field situation and the simplifying assumption of this test method. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. |
||||||
| 2. Referenced Documents | ||||||
|
Historical
1.12.2006
Historical
15.9.2008
Historical
15.9.2008
Historical
15.9.2008
Historical
15.3.2013
Historical
1.5.2012
Do you want to make sure you use only the valid technical standards?
We can offer you a solution which will provide you a monthly overview concerning the updating of standards which you use.
Would you like to know more? Look at this page.
Latest update: 2026-08-21 (Number of items: 2 298 377)
© Copyright 2026 NORMSERVIS s.r.o.